Pages
- Home
- Terms & Conditions
- Unexamined Application Backlog
- 1st Office Action Trend
- 10 Year Filing Trend
- 25 Year Active/Inactive Trend
- Madrid Filing Trend
- Current Status of 2018 Filings
- Weekly Filing Trend
- Common Word Marks
- Filings By Language
- Active Oppositions
- Active Oppositions - Duration
- Active S. 45 Cases
- Active S. 45 Cases - Duration
- Agent vs. non-Agent Filings
- Prince George Filings
- Inactive Marks
- Agent Rankings Overall
- Agent Rankings By City
- Registrability Claims
- CA-specific Vienna Classes
- Mark Events
10 May 2021
The Coming Agent Shake Out?
05 May 2021
CIPO Addresses the Backlog
On 3 May 2021 CIPO released 2 Practice Notices to address “current wait times at the examination stage”. The Notices deal with Requests for expedited examination and Measures to improve timeliness in examination. Ominously, the measures include the prospect of increased refusals by CIPO.
02 May 2021
CIPO’s Top Madrid Users
The Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) started accepting Madrid Protocol trademark registrations designating Canada less than 2 years ago, but Canada has already become a top destination for such filings. That’s both good and bad news.
23 April 2021
CIPO’s examination backlog—the Madrid effect
A backlog of trademark applications awaiting initial substantive examination by CIPO has developed over the past few years. Can the backlog be quantified, apart from anecdotal evidence? Yes it can—by working with CIPO’s trademark .xml data.
15 April 2021
Union Labels
Union labels were introduced by An Act to amend the Trade Mark and Design Act (1927) 17 George V c. 71. Only 14 examples—just 2 of which are currently active—remain in CIPO’s online trademark database and .xml data, this being one of them (see TMDA42786):
09 April 2021
General vs. Specific Marks
In An Act respecting Trade Marks and Industrial Designs (1879) 42 Vict. c. 22, Canada required “The proprietor of a trade mark applying for its registration [to] state in [the] application whether the said trade mark...is intended to be used as a general trade mark or as a specific trade mark1.” That distinction was dropped from the application requirements set forth2 in the Unfair Competition Act (1932) 22-23 George V c. 38 (the successor to 42 Vict. c. 22). However, the Unfair Competition Act grandfathered the distinction for previously registered marks3 as did the current statute4. The distinction accordingly lives on—well over a century later—in 136 general marks and 1,709 specific marks which are currently active on the Canadian trademarks register (as of 05-Apr-2021).
06 April 2021
Working With CIPO’s ‘Delete’ Files
CIPO’s weekly trademark .xml data releases often include a so-called ‘delete’ file in addition to the weekly ‘update’ file(s). By processing each week’s ‘delete’ file one can easily stay in sync with CIPO’s online trademark database. In contrast, it is more cumbersome to stay in sync with CIPO’s online patent database.
02 April 2021
Where are the Agents?
CIPO’s online trademark database does not expose trademark agent details as searchable fields. To investigate such details one must use CIPO’s .xml data, as I will demonstrate in this post.
26 March 2021
Nurses!? What about Kinsmen / Canadian Clubs?
CIPO’s “Mark Protected by Federal Act of Incorporation” category
The Help file associated with the Canadian Intellectual Property Office’s online trademark database contains a section headed The various categories of marks. One such category (as of 22-Mar-2021) is Mark Protected by Federal Act of Incorporation as shown in the Help file extract below:
22 March 2021
Accelerated (expedited) Search and Examination
In its 14-Dec-2020 “Requests for expedited examination” Practice Notice CIPO explains that it “...does not currently grant requests to examine trademark applications out of order”. The Notice then outlines an exception for “...applications associated with medical goods or services related to COVID-19”. Does the data tell us anything about expedited examination?
18 March 2021
NIDS objections—does the data help?
If you inspect any of CIPO’s 1.7 million trademark .xml files—even for a mark initially protected under the Trade Mark and Design Act (1868) 31 Vict., c. 55 or under the Unfair Competition Act (1932) 22-23 Geo. V, c. 38—you will discover that the file contains a tmk:TradeDistinctivenessIndicator element encapsulating either the word “true” or the word “false”.
12 March 2021
How current is the data?
If you work with CIPO’s trademark .xml data—or with CIPO’s online trademark database—you may encounter situations in which you need to know the exact date of the most recent event details represented in the data—or in the online database.
09 March 2021
Montreal or Montréal? ETL and data cleansing
If you click the Agent Rankings By City tab at the top of this page, then scroll down, you will find not one but four separate tabulations for: Montreal, Québec; Montreal, Quebec; Montréal, Quebec; and Montréal, Québec. Why isn’t there just one tabulation combining those four city / province combinations as shown below (click to enlarge the image)?
05 March 2021
Prosecution Events
Users of CIPO’s online trademark database will be familiar with the Action History that appears upon inspection of any “hit” returned by searching the database. You can’t search Action History events via the online database, but you can do powerful event-based searches by working with the .xml data.
01 March 2021
Mark Categories & Classes (the tmk:MarkCategory and catmk:TrademarkClass elements)
With the 
